0.12/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.12/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jul 5 04:24:54 EDT 2024 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.13/0.36 This is a THF_ problem 0.13/0.36 Running vampire_ho --cores 8 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.13/0.38 % (24743)dis+10_1:128_hud=1:i=96:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/96Mi) 0.13/0.38 % (24745)lrs+1002_1:128_au=on:c=on:fsr=off:piset=equals:i=34:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/34Mi) 0.13/0.38 % (24746)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:s2agt=32:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=385:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/385Mi) 0.13/0.38 % (24744)lrs+10_1:2_cnfonf=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=36:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/36Mi) 0.13/0.38 % (24747)dis+1002_1:128_acc=on:er=filter:i=17:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/17Mi) 0.13/0.38 % (24748)ott+1010_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:kws=inv_arity:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:sp=const_frequency:i=74:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/74Mi) 0.13/0.38 % (24749)dis+1004_1:1_cha=on:cs=on:fe=off:hud=1:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi) 0.13/0.38 % (24750)lrs+1002_1:14_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=unused:sac=on:sos=on:i=915:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/915Mi) 0.13/0.39 % (24749)Instruction limit reached! 0.13/0.39 % (24749)------------------------------ 0.13/0.39 % (24749)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100) 0.13/0.39 % (24749)Termination reason: Unknown 0.13/0.39 % (24749)Termination phase: Saturation 0.13/0.39 0.13/0.39 % (24749)Memory used [KB]: 5500 0.13/0.39 % (24749)Time elapsed: 0.006 s 0.13/0.39 % (24749)Instructions burned: 5 (million) 0.13/0.39 % (24749)------------------------------ 0.13/0.39 % (24749)------------------------------ 0.13/0.39 % (24747)Instruction limit reached! 0.13/0.39 % (24747)------------------------------ 0.13/0.39 % (24747)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100) 0.13/0.39 % (24745)First to succeed. 0.13/0.39 % (24747)Termination reason: Unknown 0.13/0.39 % (24747)Termination phase: Saturation 0.13/0.39 0.13/0.39 % (24747)Memory used [KB]: 5628 0.13/0.39 % (24747)Time elapsed: 0.015 s 0.13/0.39 % (24747)Instructions burned: 18 (million) 0.13/0.39 % (24747)------------------------------ 0.13/0.39 % (24747)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (24750)Also succeeded, but the first one will report. 0.13/0.40 % (24745)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya! 0.13/0.40 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark 0.13/0.40 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark 0.13/0.40 thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_1, type, cP: a > a > a). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_2, type, cZ: a). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_6, type, sK0: a). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_7, type, sK1: (a > $o) > a). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_8, type, sK2: (a > $o) > a). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_11, type, ph4: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)). 0.13/0.40 thf(f223,plain,( 0.13/0.40 $false), 0.13/0.40 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f222])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f222,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (cZ != cZ) | (sK0 != sK0)), 0.13/0.40 inference(superposition,[],[f16,f187])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f187,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X0 : a] : ((cZ = X0) | (sK0 != X0)) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(superposition,[],[f15,f145])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f145,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X0 : a] : (((cP @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0)))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0))))) = X0) | (cZ = X0)) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f144])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f144,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X0 : a] : (($true = (X0 = cZ)) | ((cP @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0)))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0))))) = X0)) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f143])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f143,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X0 : a] : (((cP @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0)))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0))))) = X0) | ($true != (~ (X0 = cZ)))) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f127])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f127,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X0 : a] : (($true != ((^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0))) @ cZ)) | ((cP @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0)))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : a]: (~ (X0 = Y0))))) = X0)) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[],[f12])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f12,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X10 : a,X9 : a > $o] : (($true != (X9 @ (cP @ (sK2 @ X9) @ (sK1 @ X9)))) | ($true = (X9 @ X10)) | ($true != (X9 @ cZ))) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f11,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ! [X0 : a,X1 : a,X2 : a,X3 : a] : (((X0 = X1) & (X2 = X3)) | ((cP @ X0 @ X2) != (cP @ X1 @ X3))) & ! [X4 : a,X5 : a] : (cZ != (cP @ X5 @ X4)) & ((cZ != sK0) & ! [X7 : a,X8 : a] : ((cP @ X8 @ X7) != sK0)) & ! [X9 : a > $o] : (! [X10 : a] : ($true = (X9 @ X10)) | (($true = (X9 @ (sK1 @ X9))) & ($true = (X9 @ (sK2 @ X9))) & ($true != (X9 @ (cP @ (sK2 @ X9) @ (sK1 @ X9))))) | ($true != (X9 @ cZ)))), 0.13/0.40 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f10,f9])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f9,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ? [X6 : a] : ((cZ != X6) & ! [X7 : a,X8 : a] : ((cP @ X8 @ X7) != X6)) => ((cZ != sK0) & ! [X8 : a,X7 : a] : ((cP @ X8 @ X7) != sK0))), 0.13/0.40 introduced(choice_axiom,[])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f10,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ! [X9 : a > $o] : (? [X11 : a,X12 : a] : (($true = (X9 @ X11)) & ($true = (X9 @ X12)) & ($true != (X9 @ (cP @ X12 @ X11)))) => (($true = (X9 @ (sK1 @ X9))) & ($true = (X9 @ (sK2 @ X9))) & ($true != (X9 @ (cP @ (sK2 @ X9) @ (sK1 @ X9))))))), 0.13/0.40 introduced(choice_axiom,[])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f8,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ! [X0 : a,X1 : a,X2 : a,X3 : a] : (((X0 = X1) & (X2 = X3)) | ((cP @ X0 @ X2) != (cP @ X1 @ X3))) & ! [X4 : a,X5 : a] : (cZ != (cP @ X5 @ X4)) & ? [X6 : a] : ((cZ != X6) & ! [X7 : a,X8 : a] : ((cP @ X8 @ X7) != X6)) & ! [X9 : a > $o] : (! [X10 : a] : ($true = (X9 @ X10)) | ? [X11 : a,X12 : a] : (($true = (X9 @ X11)) & ($true = (X9 @ X12)) & ($true != (X9 @ (cP @ X12 @ X11)))) | ($true != (X9 @ cZ)))), 0.13/0.40 inference(rectify,[],[f7])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f7,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ! [X1 : a,X0 : a,X2 : a,X3 : a] : (((X0 = X1) & (X2 = X3)) | ((cP @ X1 @ X2) != (cP @ X0 @ X3))) & ! [X8 : a,X9 : a] : (cZ != (cP @ X9 @ X8)) & ? [X10 : a] : ((cZ != X10) & ! [X12 : a,X11 : a] : ((cP @ X11 @ X12) != X10)) & ! [X4 : a > $o] : (! [X7 : a] : ($true = (X4 @ X7)) | ? [X5 : a,X6 : a] : (($true = (X4 @ X5)) & ($true = (X4 @ X6)) & ($true != (X4 @ (cP @ X6 @ X5)))) | ($true != (X4 @ cZ)))), 0.13/0.40 inference(flattening,[],[f6])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f6,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ? [X10 : a] : ((cZ != X10) & ! [X12 : a,X11 : a] : ((cP @ X11 @ X12) != X10)) & (! [X4 : a > $o] : (! [X7 : a] : ($true = (X4 @ X7)) | (? [X6 : a,X5 : a] : (($true != (X4 @ (cP @ X6 @ X5))) & (($true = (X4 @ X5)) & ($true = (X4 @ X6)))) | ($true != (X4 @ cZ)))) & ! [X8 : a,X9 : a] : (cZ != (cP @ X9 @ X8)) & ! [X1 : a,X0 : a,X2 : a,X3 : a] : (((X0 = X1) & (X2 = X3)) | ((cP @ X1 @ X2) != (cP @ X0 @ X3))))), 0.13/0.40 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f5,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ~((! [X4 : a > $o] : ((! [X6 : a,X5 : a] : ((($true = (X4 @ X5)) & ($true = (X4 @ X6))) => ($true = (X4 @ (cP @ X6 @ X5)))) & ($true = (X4 @ cZ))) => ! [X7 : a] : ($true = (X4 @ X7))) & ! [X8 : a,X9 : a] : (cZ != (cP @ X9 @ X8)) & ! [X0 : a,X1 : a,X2 : a,X3 : a] : (((cP @ X1 @ X2) = (cP @ X0 @ X3)) => ((X0 = X1) & (X2 = X3)))) => ! [X10 : a] : (? [X11 : a,X12 : a] : ((cP @ X11 @ X12) = X10) | (cZ = X10)))), 0.13/0.40 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f4,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ~((! [X0 : a,X1 : a,X2 : a,X3 : a] : (((cP @ X1 @ X2) = (cP @ X0 @ X3)) => ((X0 = X1) & (X2 = X3))) & ! [X4 : a > $o] : ((! [X5 : a,X6 : a] : (((X4 @ X6) & (X4 @ X5)) => (X4 @ (cP @ X6 @ X5))) & (X4 @ cZ)) => ! [X7 : a] : (X4 @ X7)) & ! [X8 : a,X9 : a] : (cZ != (cP @ X9 @ X8))) => ! [X10 : a] : (? [X11 : a,X12 : a] : ((cP @ X11 @ X12) = X10) | (cZ = X10)))), 0.13/0.40 inference(rectify,[],[f2])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,( 0.13/0.40 ~((! [X1 : a,X0 : a,X4 : a,X5 : a] : (((cP @ X0 @ X4) = (cP @ X1 @ X5)) => ((X0 = X1) & (X4 = X5))) & ! [X3 : a > $o] : ((! [X1 : a,X0 : a] : (((X3 @ X0) & (X3 @ X1)) => (X3 @ (cP @ X0 @ X1))) & (X3 @ cZ)) => ! [X0 : a] : (X3 @ X0)) & ! [X1 : a,X0 : a] : (cZ != (cP @ X0 @ X1))) => ! [X0 : a] : (? [X1 : a,X2 : a] : ((cP @ X1 @ X2) = X0) | (cZ = X0)))), 0.13/0.40 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f1,conjecture,( 0.13/0.40 (! [X1 : a,X0 : a,X4 : a,X5 : a] : (((cP @ X0 @ X4) = (cP @ X1 @ X5)) => ((X0 = X1) & (X4 = X5))) & ! [X3 : a > $o] : ((! [X1 : a,X0 : a] : (((X3 @ X0) & (X3 @ X1)) => (X3 @ (cP @ X0 @ X1))) & (X3 @ cZ)) => ! [X0 : a] : (X3 @ X0)) & ! [X1 : a,X0 : a] : (cZ != (cP @ X0 @ X1))) => ! [X0 : a] : (? [X1 : a,X2 : a] : ((cP @ X1 @ X2) = X0) | (cZ = X0))), 0.13/0.40 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cS_LEM1D_pme)). 0.13/0.40 thf(f15,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X8 : a,X7 : a] : (((cP @ X8 @ X7) != sK0)) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f16,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (cZ != sK0)), 0.13/0.40 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])). 0.13/0.40 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark 0.13/0.40 % (24745)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (24745)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100) 0.13/0.40 % (24745)Termination reason: Refutation 0.13/0.40 0.13/0.40 % (24745)Memory used [KB]: 5628 0.13/0.40 % (24745)Time elapsed: 0.016 s 0.13/0.40 % (24745)Instructions burned: 18 (million) 0.13/0.40 % (24745)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (24745)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (24742)Success in time 0.015 s 0.13/0.40 % Vampire---4.8 exiting 0.13/0.40 EOF